
In a 12-hour shift, a medical-surgical nurse might spend four to five hours on documentation. That's not an exaggeration — multiple time-motion studies have confirmed it. For every hour of direct patient care, there's nearly an equal hour of charting.
When I talk to nurses who are considering leaving the profession — and I talk to a lot of them — documentation burden comes up almost as often as staffing ratios and pay. "I didn't go to nursing school to stare at a screen" is something I hear weekly.
Nursing documentation has expanded relentlessly for three decades, driven by forces that have little to do with patient care:
Not all documentation is waste. Intake assessments, medication administration records, and critical clinical observations are essential for care continuity and safety. The question is: what's mandated by patient care, and what's mandated by everything else?
At my health system, we conducted a documentation audit that categorized every nursing documentation element into four buckets:
The results were revealing. Nearly 30% of what we asked nurses to document fell into the "redundant" or "legacy" categories. We eliminated those elements, and nursing satisfaction scores for EHR usability improved by 22 points.
We are asking nurses to absorb the documentation needs of regulators, lawyers, billers, and quality teams — on top of caring for sick patients. Every unnecessary click is time taken from the bedside. In a profession already facing a critical shortage, documentation burden isn't just an IT problem. It's a workforce crisis.
Rachel Thompson, DNP, NI-BC
Rachel is a board-certified nursing informaticist and Doctor of Nursing Practice. She leads informatics governance at a multi-hospital health system and focuses on nursing documentation and workflow standardization.
Clinical insights delivered to your inbox. No spam.